Compliance in corporate learning runs deeper than just 'Annual Compliance Training'

"This obsession with control gives a greater power to gatekeepers than to connectors. In a culture of compliance and competition, it is rational to avoid taking risks."

Celine Schillinger

Most corporate learning and development still serves a simplistic and reductive management model. 

The default focus on tools, (which now includes a proliferation of enabling 'learning technologies') means that the underpinning status quo mindset remains unchallenged. 

The underlying goal is still centralised control through 'compliance' - an unacknowledged mindset that runs deeper than just the well worn 'mandatory annual compliance training' cycle.

Symptoms of a control based L&D strategy hide in plain sight, for examples:

A default focus on individuals' 'learning' 

A default approach which reinforces a separation between 'learning' and 'working'

A default focus on only productive learning; (based on improving 'what we already know')

A default focus on learning to execute tasks and processes

A default focus on developing and broadcasting centralised 'learning content'

A default 'success criteria' built on increasing access to and consumption of centralised 'learning content'

A default focus on maintaining enhanced support for 'leaders' and 'high potential' colleagues

A default prioritisation based on 'top down' order taking (usually 'topics' driven)

A default top down annual L&D budgeting process.



 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The human stuff is the basis of 'digital learning transformations'...

Why organisations resist thinking of themselves as connected 'systems'

"The future of corporate Learning and Development" debate is five different things