L&D conference season perennial favourites

"All too often, managers surround themselves with people whose life experiences mirror their own. Over time, the gene pool becomes a stagnant pond. Year after year, it's the same people having the same conversations about the same issues, often in the same beige conference rooms. That has to change."

Michele Zanini

The economic model of large scale L&D conferences relies on perpetuating old mantras.

The familiar themes don't change as the formula is always the same:

1. Position outputs as inputs (Example: 'We need a new approach to learning...')

+

2. Position new technologies as a shortcut

+

3. Distract people from systems change.

Some typical conference hall tropes that can't change in the present system:

(Tick them off in the conference programme...)

'Moving to a performance focus'

'Creating business value'

'Creating more 'pull' for our 'learning products'

'Aligning learning to the business'

'Building a learning culture'

'Marketing for L&D'

'Measuring the ROI of learning'

'Creating content that people will love'

'Becoming more learner centric'

'Moving to skills based learning'

'L&D has to change .....'.

I work as a thinking partner and advisor with mid sized, value oriented companies going through significant change. I help you to build new capability and mindsets through shifting your approach to organisational development.

Comments

  1. Mark Britz5 April 2024 at 10:28

    Topically, you aren’t wrong. These titles or themes are found all across the spectrum of L&D events. But these are merely the content sessions, the objects that fuel the social experience. Within each are certainly nuggets of wisdom, insights, new skills and practical ideas that each individual takes into the hallways, the lunches, the dinners, the evening events to fuel their connections, to build context which will point them in new and exciting directions.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous5 April 2024 at 12:05

      Thanks for reading and commenting Mark, it’s much appreciated. I agree that the value is often created despite and beyond the status quo formula I’m highlighting here. (Which speaks volumes).

      Delete

Post a Comment

Please let me know your thoughts on this...

Popular posts from this blog

The human stuff is the basis of 'digital learning transformations'...

The human stuff is the basis of 'digital learning transformations'. The technology platforms are secondary. They work best when: They help to simplify or speed up what people have always done while working; (research / answer questions / share / store) They enable people to work in new ways that they have learned are more efficient and effective; (cooperatively / 'out loud' / across different teams) A 'digital mindset' for businesses could include these ideas: Constant change is inescapable - so it's curiosity and adaptability that create value in work teams New possibilities and solutions come from connecting many sources of information People can take responsibility for solving work problems Failing fast is helpful Creating wide and diverse networks of expertise and experience is crucial Customer ('end user') centricity keeps everyone better aligned Silos don't help Flatter, less hierarchical teams move ideas and solutions
Read more

Why organisations resist thinking of themselves as connected 'systems'

“In a world of separation and domination, systems thinking is subversive.” Dr Elizabeth Sawin The key to improving the work of organisations - and the contributions of the people in them - is to look at them as connected 'systems'. (Put another way, because improving the performance of individual silos won’t make the overall performance of the organisation any better). However nobody seems to want to do this. So, who’s resisting systems thinking? Executives don’t want it because means questioning the current mindset and behaviours that have brought them status and ‘results’ Individual managers don’t want it because they assume it threatens their control over their local silos L&D / HR don’t want it because their remit does not extent to the organisation, as its still rooted in the ‘performance’ of individuals (and occasionally, specific teams). And employees don't want it because they often don’t care / need to care about the overall organisation.
Read more

"The future of corporate Learning and Development" debate is five different things

"Pushing fancy new stuff onto your organisation will not change the outcomes if that is not emerging from your system itself, through the ripening of a different worldview." Stelio Verzera The perennial topic  of "The future of corporate Learning and Development" is always everywhere. This ' Shirky Principle ' fuels and sustains the status quo and the players that continue to benefit from it. I'd argue that the discussion is in fact five very   different conversations happening in parallel, but unequally distributed. They are - in current descending order of noise, ambition and opportunity: 1. 'MAKE THE TRAINING BETTER'. The status quo. The economic model. Dependent on maintaining the belief that educating individual workers changes the system through which complex, interconnected organisations perform. This narrative is carefully preserved by (mostly) commercial vendors who have filled the strategy vacuum. New technologies, new (and old) instruc
Read more