Most senior people in large organisations only have one job. To keep their job.


Most senior people in large organisations only have one job. That is to keep their job. This is not a criticism, because it's inevitable. It is how hierarchy businesses have evolved over 100 years. The majority of senior people's time and capacity is spent assessing requests from stakeholders and processing how much risk they present. In a hierarchy business, where achievement equals status, this risk radar becomes honed. A bias towards short term thinking, about 'hard' stuff (risk, money, data, profit, reputation) often prevails.

Understanding this status game is a new challenge for L&D professionals who want to lead a change away from the old rules. Most corporate training is still based on the idea of knowledge transfer (regardless of the latest fad or technology). The objective of knowledge transfer is to scale understanding of the (one) way that things get done around here. This dates back to Henry Ford and the birth of industrialisation. Mass production, system based, efficient and effective. People were interchangeable, part of 'the system'. A few people were dominant, in charge of the process and minimising the risks. Everyone else stayed on the line and complied.

So choosing to develop a 'learning culture' presents leaders with a completely opposite view. A learning culture is less about the opportunities provided to learn, but the idea that everyone has an equal contribution to make. Questioning, trying, failing and reflecting are successes in themselves.
A learning culture relies on the shared belief that people have the will and the capacity to change their own environment and make their own fate. A learning culture needs a shared commitment to open (two-way) communication. A learning culture thrives on co-ordination and co-operation across many teams at every level of the hierarchy.

In the new post-industrial organisation, L&D can role model a new approach that appreciates whole human beings, their passions and their voluntary participation. The new challenge is to help leaders create communities who can organise themselves around shared goals and shared information.

It's L&D who should be comfortable to lose their old job and embrace something very different.

I work as a thinking partner and advisor with mid sized, value oriented companies going through significant change. I help you to build new capability and mindsets through shifting your approach to organisational development.

Comments

  1. Unknown9 May 2018 at 22:34

    It can become a full time job just keeping your job and when push come to shove it's learning and development that takes the hit. It's a culture of surviving and not thriving that sees it all falling down.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Please let me know your thoughts on this...

Popular posts from this blog

The human stuff is the basis of 'digital learning transformations'...

The human stuff is the basis of 'digital learning transformations'. The technology platforms are secondary. They work best when: They help to simplify or speed up what people have always done while working; (research / answer questions / share / store) They enable people to work in new ways that they have learned are more efficient and effective; (cooperatively / 'out loud' / across different teams) A 'digital mindset' for businesses could include these ideas: Constant change is inescapable - so it's curiosity and adaptability that create value in work teams New possibilities and solutions come from connecting many sources of information People can take responsibility for solving work problems Failing fast is helpful Creating wide and diverse networks of expertise and experience is crucial Customer ('end user') centricity keeps everyone better aligned Silos don't help Flatter, less hierarchical teams move ideas and solutions
Read more

Why organisations resist thinking of themselves as connected 'systems'

“In a world of separation and domination, systems thinking is subversive.” Dr Elizabeth Sawin The key to improving the work of organisations - and the contributions of the people in them - is to look at them as connected 'systems'. (Put another way, because improving the performance of individual silos won’t make the overall performance of the organisation any better). However nobody seems to want to do this. So, who’s resisting systems thinking? Executives don’t want it because means questioning the current mindset and behaviours that have brought them status and ‘results’ Individual managers don’t want it because they assume it threatens their control over their local silos L&D / HR don’t want it because their remit does not extent to the organisation, as its still rooted in the ‘performance’ of individuals (and occasionally, specific teams). And employees don't want it because they often don’t care / need to care about the overall organisation.
Read more

"The future of corporate Learning and Development" debate is five different things

"Pushing fancy new stuff onto your organisation will not change the outcomes if that is not emerging from your system itself, through the ripening of a different worldview." Stelio Verzera The perennial topic  of "The future of corporate Learning and Development" is always everywhere. This ' Shirky Principle ' fuels and sustains the status quo and the players that continue to benefit from it. I'd argue that the discussion is in fact five very   different conversations happening in parallel, but unequally distributed. They are - in current descending order of noise, ambition and opportunity: 1. 'MAKE THE TRAINING BETTER'. The status quo. The economic model. Dependent on maintaining the belief that educating individual workers changes the system through which complex, interconnected organisations perform. This narrative is carefully preserved by (mostly) commercial vendors who have filled the strategy vacuum. New technologies, new (and old) instruc
Read more