The biggest challenge facing the 'Learning and Development' industry is defining the change it actually wants to make in the world


"Strategy is turning the resources you have into the power you need, to win the change you want."

Marshall Ganz

"If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there."

Lewis Carrroll

I believe the biggest challenge facing the 'L&D' industry is to define the change it actually wants to make in the world.

For work. For organisations. For leaders. For teams. For individual workers.

What's the context?
What are the problems to solve?
What are the strategic choices?
What impact will we make?

The default 'L&D' narrative remains focused on training delivery, operations and logistics. The pot of gold at the end of the rainbow seems to be affirmation and acceptance from the industrialists. The overriding objective? - to land contributions to 'business critical' projects.

Seemingly, there is little ambition beyond reinforcing the 'on time / on budget / on spec.' mindset required by status quo organisational systems.

Ironically despite this obsession with execution and delivery tools and programs (I include 'courses', 'content', 'channels', 'technologies', 'platforms', 'measurement methodologies',  'tracking' and 'comms.'), 'L&D' continues to struggle to build engagement with those who in theory should benefit most.

Meanwhile, here are some strategic cultural and leadership challenges faced by many organisations that instructional design alone won't solve:

1. Defining and leading the conditions and expectations for a deliberately learning organisation. For its leaders, employees and teams.

2. Coordinating a continuous learning strategy that aligns an organisation's culture, business value and the work to be done. 

3. Supporting and refining work as it happens today alongside space to generate new ideas and opportunities that can change the business for the better for its customers and employees.

4. Enabling connections to the people, experiences and opportunities inside and outside the organisation that help employees to do better work.

Paul helps 'L&D' teams to create their own map and to go beyond serving only 'productivity' and busyness
I work as a thinking partner and advisor with mid sized, value oriented companies going through significant change. I help you to build new capability and mindsets through shifting your approach to organisational development.

Comments

Post a Comment

Please let me know your thoughts on this...

Popular posts from this blog

The human stuff is the basis of 'digital learning transformations'...

The human stuff is the basis of 'digital learning transformations'. The technology platforms are secondary. They work best when: They help to simplify or speed up what people have always done while working; (research / answer questions / share / store) They enable people to work in new ways that they have learned are more efficient and effective; (cooperatively / 'out loud' / across different teams) A 'digital mindset' for businesses could include these ideas: Constant change is inescapable - so it's curiosity and adaptability that create value in work teams New possibilities and solutions come from connecting many sources of information People can take responsibility for solving work problems Failing fast is helpful Creating wide and diverse networks of expertise and experience is crucial Customer ('end user') centricity keeps everyone better aligned Silos don't help Flatter, less hierarchical teams move ideas and solutions
Read more

Why organisations resist thinking of themselves as connected 'systems'

“In a world of separation and domination, systems thinking is subversive.” Dr Elizabeth Sawin The key to improving the work of organisations - and the contributions of the people in them - is to look at them as connected 'systems'. (Put another way, because improving the performance of individual silos won’t make the overall performance of the organisation any better). However nobody seems to want to do this. So, who’s resisting systems thinking? Executives don’t want it because means questioning the current mindset and behaviours that have brought them status and ‘results’ Individual managers don’t want it because they assume it threatens their control over their local silos L&D / HR don’t want it because their remit does not extent to the organisation, as its still rooted in the ‘performance’ of individuals (and occasionally, specific teams). And employees don't want it because they often don’t care / need to care about the overall organisation.
Read more

"The future of corporate Learning and Development" debate is five different things

"Pushing fancy new stuff onto your organisation will not change the outcomes if that is not emerging from your system itself, through the ripening of a different worldview." Stelio Verzera The perennial topic  of "The future of corporate Learning and Development" is always everywhere. This ' Shirky Principle ' fuels and sustains the status quo and the players that continue to benefit from it. I'd argue that the discussion is in fact five very   different conversations happening in parallel, but unequally distributed. They are - in current descending order of noise, ambition and opportunity: 1. 'MAKE THE TRAINING BETTER'. The status quo. The economic model. Dependent on maintaining the belief that educating individual workers changes the system through which complex, interconnected organisations perform. This narrative is carefully preserved by (mostly) commercial vendors who have filled the strategy vacuum. New technologies, new (and old) instruc
Read more