The Learning and Development function can choose to help develop a 'template' for change



According to the Havard Business Review 2018 "Leaders Guide to Corporate Culture" only 7% of the 1,300 CEOs interviewed were intentionally developing a culture of continuous learning.

The remaining 93% confirmed that a culture of "Results focus" remained their number one or number two objective...

This crushing insight presents a stark survival choice for 'L&D' teams stuck in a (supposedly) "Results focus" organisational culture:

Option 1

"If you can't convince them, join them"

Continue to work to convince busy senior people who are striving their way to the "Results" first culture desired by their boss that L&D are also in fact "all about results, just like you". They can rest assured that we have the "resources", "platforms", and "methodologies" that can definitely "help". 

In short, be on hand to take requests for "solutions" that "ensure" that "people" "get what's needed" so they can "deliver performance". 

L&D as a responsive, serving, business support function. A function that reinforces and perpetuates the myth of "Results focus" as a differentiating strategy for businesses today.

Option 2

'L&D' step forward and help the organisation to change its culture. Create a template for change.

Some ideas might include:

Identifying the pockets of "enlightened" individuals, managers, teams where continuous learning is already understood and encouraged as a driver of change and performance improvement. Prioritising support with and for these "early adopter" groups;

Working closely with managers to understand and agree the nature of the work to be improved or enhanced; (routine, process work? complex work? discovery work?);

Working collaboratively with managers and teams to understand and define the performance gaps to be closed and what we collectively agree as "high performance";

Coaching colleagues to take ever more responsibility for their own continuous, self managed learning. Encouraging them to share their successes (and challenges) with their bosses and peers;

Organising and facilitating more and new opportunities that bring individuals and teams together (in person or virtually);

Creating and facilitating more opportunities, connections, introductions (and where needed, resources) that support people to do better work and grow in confidence;

Finding ways to build more energy and opportunities for curiosity, questions and, "positive dissent"

Investing equal time and resources in developing efficiency and adaptability in the organisation. Making this a "KPI";

Finding new ways for information, ideas, knowledge and feedback to move faster between teams.


Paul helps corporate L&D teams to reflect on the idea that fitting in isn't actually helping anyone




I work as a thinking partner and advisor with mid sized, value oriented companies going through significant change. I help you to build new capability and mindsets through shifting your approach to organisational development.

Comments

Post a Comment

Please let me know your thoughts on this...

Popular posts from this blog

The human stuff is the basis of 'digital learning transformations'...

The human stuff is the basis of 'digital learning transformations'. The technology platforms are secondary. They work best when: They help to simplify or speed up what people have always done while working; (research / answer questions / share / store) They enable people to work in new ways that they have learned are more efficient and effective; (cooperatively / 'out loud' / across different teams) A 'digital mindset' for businesses could include these ideas: Constant change is inescapable - so it's curiosity and adaptability that create value in work teams New possibilities and solutions come from connecting many sources of information People can take responsibility for solving work problems Failing fast is helpful Creating wide and diverse networks of expertise and experience is crucial Customer ('end user') centricity keeps everyone better aligned Silos don't help Flatter, less hierarchical teams move ideas and solutions
Read more

Why organisations resist thinking of themselves as connected 'systems'

“In a world of separation and domination, systems thinking is subversive.” Dr Elizabeth Sawin The key to improving the work of organisations - and the contributions of the people in them - is to look at them as connected 'systems'. (Put another way, because improving the performance of individual silos won’t make the overall performance of the organisation any better). However nobody seems to want to do this. So, who’s resisting systems thinking? Executives don’t want it because means questioning the current mindset and behaviours that have brought them status and ‘results’ Individual managers don’t want it because they assume it threatens their control over their local silos L&D / HR don’t want it because their remit does not extent to the organisation, as its still rooted in the ‘performance’ of individuals (and occasionally, specific teams). And employees don't want it because they often don’t care / need to care about the overall organisation.
Read more

"The future of corporate Learning and Development" debate is five different things

"Pushing fancy new stuff onto your organisation will not change the outcomes if that is not emerging from your system itself, through the ripening of a different worldview." Stelio Verzera The perennial topic  of "The future of corporate Learning and Development" is always everywhere. This ' Shirky Principle ' fuels and sustains the status quo and the players that continue to benefit from it. I'd argue that the discussion is in fact five very   different conversations happening in parallel, but unequally distributed. They are - in current descending order of noise, ambition and opportunity: 1. 'MAKE THE TRAINING BETTER'. The status quo. The economic model. Dependent on maintaining the belief that educating individual workers changes the system through which complex, interconnected organisations perform. This narrative is carefully preserved by (mostly) commercial vendors who have filled the strategy vacuum. New technologies, new (and old) instruc
Read more