Making the leap to joined up thinking

"We tend to focus on snapshots of isolated parts of the system. And wonder why our deepest problems never get solved."

Peter Senge

We know that providing isolated formal learning interventions (usually e-learning modules and training courses) have little or no impact on individual or team performance. 

It takes courage, curiosity and foresight for leaders to see beyond the training paradigm (and to stop colluding in it) and start to see enabling new capability and performance as a connected, inter-dependent system.

Some new questions that can help start this new practice might include:

What are the short, medium, and long term success measures for this initiative?

Who has defined these success measures? Why?

How effectively do this success measures link to our overall strategy and stated 'values'?

 How will we create time for leaders and their teams to focus on this new initiative? (What will stop?)

Where does this initiative sit in the priorities of its 'target audience'? Why?

How effectively are 'target audience' teams resourced to maximise the potential benefits of this initiative?

Will 'target audience' teams to re-allocate budgets to maximise the potential benefits of this initiative?

How are we developing buy in from leaders for this new initiative?

How are we incentivising adoption of this new initiative? (What will be the consequences for failing to engage and embed successfully?)

How are we defining new performance standards that this new initiative should enable? (processes, governance, KPIs, metrics)

How are we ensuring leaders and team members will know how to perform differently(new processes, new ways of working, new collaborations) in relation to this initiative?

How are we aligning people's roles, responsibilities, and success measures to this new initiative?

How does the communication strategy enable, support, and sustain the potential success of this new initiative? 

I work as a thinking partner and advisor with mid sized, value oriented companies going through significant change. I help you to build new capability and mindsets through shifting your approach to organisational development.

Comments

Post a Comment

Please let me know your thoughts on this...

Popular posts from this blog

The human stuff is the basis of 'digital learning transformations'...

The human stuff is the basis of 'digital learning transformations'. The technology platforms are secondary. They work best when: They help to simplify or speed up what people have always done while working; (research / answer questions / share / store) They enable people to work in new ways that they have learned are more efficient and effective; (cooperatively / 'out loud' / across different teams) A 'digital mindset' for businesses could include these ideas: Constant change is inescapable - so it's curiosity and adaptability that create value in work teams New possibilities and solutions come from connecting many sources of information People can take responsibility for solving work problems Failing fast is helpful Creating wide and diverse networks of expertise and experience is crucial Customer ('end user') centricity keeps everyone better aligned Silos don't help Flatter, less hierarchical teams move ideas and solutions
Read more

Why organisations resist thinking of themselves as connected 'systems'

“In a world of separation and domination, systems thinking is subversive.” Dr Elizabeth Sawin The key to improving the work of organisations - and the contributions of the people in them - is to look at them as connected 'systems'. (Put another way, because improving the performance of individual silos won’t make the overall performance of the organisation any better). However nobody seems to want to do this. So, who’s resisting systems thinking? Executives don’t want it because means questioning the current mindset and behaviours that have brought them status and ‘results’ Individual managers don’t want it because they assume it threatens their control over their local silos L&D / HR don’t want it because their remit does not extent to the organisation, as its still rooted in the ‘performance’ of individuals (and occasionally, specific teams). And employees don't want it because they often don’t care / need to care about the overall organisation.
Read more

"The future of corporate Learning and Development" debate is five different things

"Pushing fancy new stuff onto your organisation will not change the outcomes if that is not emerging from your system itself, through the ripening of a different worldview." Stelio Verzera The perennial topic  of "The future of corporate Learning and Development" is always everywhere. This ' Shirky Principle ' fuels and sustains the status quo and the players that continue to benefit from it. I'd argue that the discussion is in fact five very   different conversations happening in parallel, but unequally distributed. They are - in current descending order of noise, ambition and opportunity: 1. 'MAKE THE TRAINING BETTER'. The status quo. The economic model. Dependent on maintaining the belief that educating individual workers changes the system through which complex, interconnected organisations perform. This narrative is carefully preserved by (mostly) commercial vendors who have filled the strategy vacuum. New technologies, new (and old) instruc
Read more