Reputation and status

"Managers are concerned with reputation. They are not concerned with improving their systems. I think they should be concerned with improving their systems."

John Seddon

In our organisations, leaders could choose to define 'performance' as 'the ability for the people we hired to fulfil their potential in the environment we have created here'.

We know that organisational systems determine 'performance' and that systems ('the way the work works here') are wholly owned by the leaders.

But the industrial, directive, pace-setting, process and tools led safety zone perpetuated by leaders - focused on managing reputation and status - inevitably discourages a focus on systems. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Breaking the familiar cycle of the way that Learning and Development teams operate in corporate organisations

Why organisations resist thinking of themselves as connected 'systems'

No one in corporate 'L&D' wants to create LESS 'L&D'